Developed with input from members of the BeInCrypto Expert Council, including experts from AWS and Cloudflare, our new report looks at what the observable activity shows, how much money is moving, and where the hype runs ahead of the data.
By BeInCrypto Research
AI agents that can pay for things on their own are one of the loudest and most repeating stories in crypto right now. Stablecoins, new payment protocols and big-name launches keep making headlines. But how much of it is actually happening?
That is the question behind The State of AI Agent Payments 2026, the new report from BeInCrypto Research. We are launching it at TOKEN2049 Singapore, taking place 7-8 October at Marina Bay Sands.
The report looks at real-world use, not forecasts. It follows the money on-chain, reviews what products allow agents to do, and asks a simple question for businesses: what needs to be true before this goes mainstream?
What we found
- Most x402 payments are tiny. In a 35-day sample of x402 payments on Base and Solana, we recorded 6.4 million transactions worth just $119,947 in total. 90.8% of them were worth less than one cent. That is exactly the kind of payment cards were never built for, and it explains why stablecoins keep coming up.
- Lots of transactions does not mean lots of demand. Solana accounted for 94.5% of the sample’s transactions, and most of that came in just eight days. On 26 August alone, 145 addresses made 1,283,926 payments to just three recipient addresses. We don’t call that wash activity or establish intent, but it shows why transaction counts alone say little about real business demand.
- What gets paid for is small and practical. The most-requested paid x402 resource was a two-cent token safety check, with 63,319 calls in the catalogue’s sampled period. Most of the top services supplied information or completed small software tasks. These are calls recorded, not confirmed purchases.
- People still hold the reins. Of 19 AI products and workflows we reviewed, 14 act within limits set in advance by a person or business. None of the 19 sets its own goals. Five of the seven trading platforms we looked at explicitly block agents from withdrawing funds.
- AI trading is still a small slice. Across four selected Hyperliquid connections, applications labelled as AI handled just 0.55% of $653.08 million in trading value. Almost all of it, 99.4%, went through CCXT, a standard connection tool that makes no AI claim. AI may also trade through CCXT unlabelled, so this is not a market-wide figure.
- When things go wrong, they go wrong fast. We documented two incidents, including a public message that triggered a $175,000 transfer from an AI-linked wallet. Together, they sent $281,200 to attacker-controlled wallets before any recoveries.
- The money is following the pipes. We reviewed 36 funding rounds and acquisitions worth $4.25 billion in disclosed value. Around 92% went to payment and cash-management businesses, not to trading agents.
Get the report
Download The State of AI Agent Payments 2026 here:research.beincrypto.com/agentic-payments-2026
Get a hard copy of the report at the BeInCrypto NewsDesk located at PB4-45 (Level 4, Marina Bay Sands) and answer our ‘Question of the Day’ survey while you’re there. We’ll collect answers across both days and feed them into the next edition, so you could end up in the research, not just reading it.
BeInCrypto is part of the BeInNews Academy Ltd, an independent media group covering the convergence of finance and digital assets.We help professionals act with confidence in a complex and fast-changing industry through our newsroom, research reports, events, expert councils and multimedia studio.
